有効的なEDGE EDGE-Expert受験料 &合格スムーズEDGE-Expert関連資料 |信頼的なEDGE-Expert受験資料更新版
EDGE-Expert試験参考書を購入すると、完璧なアフターサービスと高品質なを楽しむことができます。だから、あなたは私たちのEDGE-Expert試験参考書から、驚きを得ることができると信じています。また、あなたがEDGE-Expert試験参考書の費用を支払う前にサービスを楽しむことができるだけでなく、購入後1年間無料でEDGE-Expert試験参考書の更新版を楽しむこともできます。
そんなに多くの人はEDGE EDGE-Expert試験に合格できるのに興味がわきますか。人に引けをとりたくないあなたはEDGE EDGE-Expert資格認定を取得したいですか。ここで、彼らはEDGE-Expert試験にうまく合格できる秘訣は我々社の提供する質高いEDGE EDGE-Expert問題集を利用したことだと教えます。弊社のEDGE EDGE-Expert問題集を通して復習してから、真実的に自分の能力の向上を感じ、EDGE-Expert資格認定を受け取ります。
EDGE EDGE-Expert関連資料、EDGE-Expert受験資料更新版
Tech4Examの問題集を購入したら、あなたの試験合格率が100%を保証いたします。もしEDGE-Expert試験に失敗したら、弊社が全額で返金いたします。
EDGE Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies (EDGE Expert) Exam 認定 EDGE-Expert 試験問題 (Q70-Q75):
質問 # 70
Who are licensed to train candidates as EDGE Experts and EDGE Auditors?
正解：A
解説：
Training for EDGE Experts and Auditors is a structured process managed by specific entities authorized by the IFC. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols specify: "EDGE Faculty are licensed by IFC to deliver training for candidates aspiring to become EDGE Experts and EDGE Auditors. These trainers are selected and trained by IFC to ensure consistency and quality in the delivery of EDGE training programs" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 3.2: Training Requirements). Option A, EDGE Faculty, directly matches this description. Option B (EDGE Auditors) is incorrect, as auditors perform audits, not training, per the protocols: "EDGE Auditors are responsible for verifying project compliance, not for training others" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.2: Roles). Option C (EDGE Certification Providers) is also incorrect, as their role is to issue certifications, not conduct training: "Certification Providers like GBCI issue EDGE certificates but do not train candidates" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.3: Certification Process).
Option D (Accredited EDGE Experts) is wrong, as Experts advise on projects, not train others, as per the protocols: "EDGE Experts provide consultancy services to project teams" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles).
Reference:EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 3.2: Training Requirements, Section 2.1: Roles, Section 2.2: Roles; EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.3: Certification Process.
質問 # 71
What is the minimum percentage of efficient lightbulbs that must be installed to claim the measure EEM22 - Efficient Lighting for Internal Areas?
正解：C
解説：
The EDGE measure EEM22 - Efficient Lighting for Internal Areas focuses on reducing energy consumption through the use of efficient lighting. The EDGE User Guide specifies the requirements for this measure: "To claim EEM22 - Efficient Lighting for Internal Areas, at least 90% of the lamps in internal areas must be energy-efficient, such as LED or CFL, with a luminous efficacy of at least 80 lumens per watt. This threshold ensures significant energy savings while allowing for minimal exceptions in specific areas" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.4: Lighting Efficiency Measures). Option C, 90%, directly matches this requirement. Option A (70%) and Option B (80%) are below the threshold, thus not qualifying for the measure. Option D (100%) exceeds the minimum requirement, but EDGE allows for flexibility with a 90% threshold to accommodate practical constraints: "A 90% requirement balances practicality with energy savings, recognizing that some areas may require specialized lighting" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.4: Lighting Calculations). Therefore, the minimum percentage to claim EEM22 is 90% (Option C).
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 4.4: Lighting Efficiency Measures; EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.4: Lighting Calculations.
質問 # 72
Which of the following can deliver the highest efficiency in fans and pumps?
正解：C
解説：
Efficiency in fans and pumps is a critical aspect of green building design in EDGE, particularly for reducing energy consumption in HVAC systems. The EDGE User Guide provides detailed guidance on efficiency measures for mechanical systems: "Variable speed drives (VSDs) deliver the highest efficiency in fans and pumps by adjusting the motor speed to match the actual demand, significantly reducing energy consumption compared to fixed-speed systems. VSDs can achieve energy savings of up to 30-50% in HVAC applications by avoiding the constant operation at full speed typical of single or constant speed drives" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures). Option D, variable speed drive, aligns with this description as the most efficient option. Option A (two speed drive) offers some efficiency by allowing two operating speeds, but it is less flexible than VSDs: "Two speed drives provide limited efficiency gains, as they cannot continuously adjust to varying loads, unlike variable speed drives" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics). Option B (single speed drive) and Option C (constant speed drive) are essentially the same in this context, operating at a fixed speed regardless of demand, leading to energy waste: "Single speed or constant speed drives run at a fixed rate, resulting in higher energy consumption compared to variable speed drives, which modulate speed based on need" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2:
Energy Efficiency Measures). The EDGE Methodology Report further elaborates: "Variable speed drives are the most efficient option for fans and pumps in EDGE, as they minimize energy use by matching output to demand, unlike two speed or constant speed drives, which operate inefficiently under partial loads" (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics). This makes variable speed drives (Option D) the clear choice for delivering the highest efficiency in fans and pumps.
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures; EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics.
質問 # 73
The Client informs an EDGE Auditor that a key member of the design team has resigned. The Client requests the Auditor to take the member's place for the remainder of the project's design development as it would provide the Auditor an opportunity to identify suitable green building measures, making audit tasks much simpler. What should the EDGE Auditor do?
正解：B
解説：
The EDGE framework strictly prohibits Auditors from engaging in roles that could compromise their independence, such as providing design consultancy on the same project they are auditing. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols address this scenario explicitly: "An EDGE Auditor must not accept any role in the design development of a project they are auditing, as this creates a conflict of interest by blurring the lines between consultancy and independent verification. If the Client requests the Auditor to take on a design role, the Auditor should decline and may refer the Client to another qualified professional who is not involved in the audit process" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option B, refer the Client to an associate within the organization who works in another department, but is qualified and available to carry out the work, aligns with this guidance, as it maintains the Auditor's independence while helping the Client find a suitable replacement. Option A (resign from the audit role) is an overreaction, as the request itself does not compromise the Auditor's position unless accepted: "The Auditor is not required to resign unless they have already engaged in a conflicting role, which can be avoided by declining the request" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.1: Audit Process). Option C (accept the additional commission) is unethical, as it violates conflict-of-interest rules: "Accepting a design role on a project being audited undermines the Auditor's impartiality, as they would be auditing theirown work, which is strictly prohibited" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process). Option D (refer the Client to an associate working with the Auditor on the EDGE audit) is also incorrect, as this associate is already involved in the audit, creating a potential conflict: "Referring the Client to someone involved in the same audit does not resolve the conflict of interest, as the audit team must remain independent from design activities" (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). The EDGE User Guide reinforces this principle: "Auditors must maintain strict separation from design roles to ensure an unbiased audit, and should assist the Client by referring them to independent professionals if needed" (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.5:
Working with EDGE Auditors). Thus, referring the Client to a qualified associate in another department (Option B) is the correct action.
Reference:EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest, Section 4.1: Audit Process; EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 6.5:
Working with EDGE Auditors.
質問 # 74
To claim efficiency measure Insulation for Cold Storage Envelope, which of the following documents is required as evidence at the preliminary certification stage?
正解：A
解説：
The preliminary certification stage requires specific documentation to verify the implementation of efficiency measures like Insulation for Cold Storage Envelope. The EDGE Certification Protocol outlines the evidence requirements: "For measures involving insulation, such as Insulation for Cold Storage Envelope, the Client must provide drawings at the preliminary certification stage that specify the U-value of the installed insulation to demonstrate compliance with the measure's requirements. The U-value must be lower than the Base Case to qualify for savings" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option C, drawings showing the U-value specification of the cold storage envelope, directly aligns with this requirement. Option A (calculations of Coefficient of Performance) is irrelevant, as COP applies to HVAC systems, not insulation:
"COP is used for chillers, not insulation measures" (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures). Option B (manufacturer's data sheets for the HVAC system) is also unrelated, as the measure focuses on the envelope, not HVAC: "HVAC documentation is not required for insulation measures" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements). Option D (purchase receipts showing the U-value) is more relevant at the post-construction stage: "Purchase receipts are typically required at the post-construction stage to confirm installation, while drawings suffice for design-stage verification" (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.4: Post-Construction Requirements). Thus, drawings with U-value specifications (Option C) are required at preliminary certification.
Reference:EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements, Section 3.4: Post-Construction Requirements; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures.
質問 # 75
......
他のたくさんのトレーニング資料より、Tech4ExamのEDGEのEDGE-Expert試験トレーニング資料は一番良いものです。IT認証のトレーニング資料が必要としたら、Tech4ExamのEDGEのEDGE-Expert試験トレーニング資料を利用しなければ絶対後悔しますよ。Tech4Examのトレーニング資料を選んだら、あなたは一生で利益を受けることができます。
EDGE-Expert関連資料: https://www.tech4exam.com/EDGE-Expert-pass-shiken.html
Tech4Examの専門家チームが君の需要を満たすために自分の経験と知識を利用してEDGEのEDGE-Expert認定試験対策模擬テスト問題集が研究しました、EDGE EDGE-Expert受験料 それで、金銭のロースを心配しなくて、自分の力で試します、心配なくて我々のEDGE-Expert Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies (EDGE Expert) Exam試験問題集を購入できます、ウェブサイトでEDGE-Expert試験に合格するには、20〜30時間かかります、そして、EDGE-Expert試験材料は、プレートの多くの研究部分がユーザーの熱意を喚起するのに十分であり、ユーザーが集中力を維持できるようにします、試験に合格させる高品質のEDGE-Expert関連資料 - Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies (EDGE Expert) Exam試験模擬pdf版があなたにとって最良の選択です。
巽（たつみ）から吹く風が強くなりそうになっては又歇（や）む、進退きわまった柏木に助け船を出してくれたのは、他ならぬ箕輪で、Tech4Examの専門家チームが君の需要を満たすために自分の経験と知識を利用してEDGEのEDGE-Expert認定試験対策模擬テスト問題集が研究しました。
更新するEDGE-Expert受験料試験-試験の準備方法-ハイパスレートのEDGE-Expert関連資料
それで、金銭のロースを心配しなくて、自分の力で試します、心配なくて我々のEDGE-Expert Excellence in Design for Greater Efficiencies (EDGE Expert) Exam試験問題集を購入できます、ウェブサイトでEDGE-Expert試験に合格するには、20〜30時間かかります、そして、EDGE-Expert試験材料は、プレートの多くの研究部分がユーザーの熱意を喚起するのに十分であり、ユーザーが集中力を維持できるようにします。
© 2024 NXT Nerd. All Rights Reserved
